What's the point of marriage?
- Thread starter Veritas
- Start date
Wait until faceblogger goes for his trip to Mexico. But we must be careful, he may kill me if I suck you too hard.
Face, you are a narcissist. Your woman looks like a female version of you. All those times I told you to go fuck yourself, you actually did, huh? Pretty cool.
You can thank feminism for this.
Marriage was an institution for securing your progeny and thus how your property is disposed when you pass on. That's becoming less relevant today since most people are broke and we have advanced testing for paternity.
But to people with large amounts of wealth, including royalty, marriage can be very important.
You bitch! You cheated on faceblogger with IceToEskimos, I'm not surprised he hit your whore-face!!! Stay away from my husband!
I think a big point of marriage is to raise decent children. Broken families and children without parents usually end up making the world a worse place. Marriage is a way to commit to raising children and helping to prepare the next generation for the world.
I think contracts for marriage are kind of pointless -- but the actual commitment of two people to decide to raise decent children is probably one of the most important things two people can do, which starts with some type of mutual agreement.
I think contracts for marriage are kind of pointless -- but the actual commitment of two people to decide to raise decent children is probably one of the most important things two people can do, which starts with some type of mutual agreement.
One srs reply for the OP:
In contemporary 1st World societies, there isn't much benefit to marriage for either side. It's more of a custom than anything else at this point.
In contemporary 1st World societies, there isn't much benefit to marriage for either side. It's more of a custom than anything else at this point.
Hello friend,
Point of marriage is so women can serve you and family. If can get women to serve you and family without marry that good to but usual women want you marry her before she willing serve you and family.
Good luck bro
Point of marriage is so women can serve you and family. If can get women to serve you and family without marry that good to but usual women want you marry her before she willing serve you and family.
Good luck bro
Marriage....the Perfect Union of a Man and a Woman.
Marriage will actually EXTEND your life and the life of your mate if you are paired up well.
If not well paired well it can end BOTH your lives early.
I still find it FUNNY that in today's society SINGLE guys still think that married guys have pussy on constant endless tap from their Wife.
True in some marriages, but they are in the minority.
If you want children marriage is a good deal, again.....if well paired.
I would SUGGEST that you young guys, under 30 just keep making money & acquiring wealth and then when you're set at like age 40 to 50 marry some 20 year old gal and have your family then. (Oh, and don't be affraid to use a pre-hup.)
Study most any successful guy that is over 40 and you'll see that he is most likley on his SECOND family and HAPPIER in the second one than he was in the first.
His second wife will most likely be at least 10 years younger than him as well.
But hey, it swings BOTH ways. It's the old 20/80 rule again. About 20% of the Men out there have a clue as to how to treat a woman and only about 20% of the women out there know how to treat a man.
So, in today's society it's a difficult task indeed to have a Happy Marriage.
At least here in the Good Ole' U.S. Of A/Assholes!!
lol
Marriage will actually EXTEND your life and the life of your mate if you are paired up well.
If not well paired well it can end BOTH your lives early.
I still find it FUNNY that in today's society SINGLE guys still think that married guys have pussy on constant endless tap from their Wife.
True in some marriages, but they are in the minority.
If you want children marriage is a good deal, again.....if well paired.
I would SUGGEST that you young guys, under 30 just keep making money & acquiring wealth and then when you're set at like age 40 to 50 marry some 20 year old gal and have your family then. (Oh, and don't be affraid to use a pre-hup.)
Study most any successful guy that is over 40 and you'll see that he is most likley on his SECOND family and HAPPIER in the second one than he was in the first.
His second wife will most likely be at least 10 years younger than him as well.
But hey, it swings BOTH ways. It's the old 20/80 rule again. About 20% of the Men out there have a clue as to how to treat a woman and only about 20% of the women out there know how to treat a man.
So, in today's society it's a difficult task indeed to have a Happy Marriage.
At least here in the Good Ole' U.S. Of A/Assholes!!
lol
Now that's the libertarian "customer" purpose. Deciding fatherhood to support inheritance, and pretty much enforce the prostitution contract aspect of relationship.
That's no longer relevant because we can just test paternity with science. Also contract enforcement can be done either by splitting deals into smaller pieces, which is what most prostitute do.
Now see things from the point of view of politicians.
Marriage means government got to be da pimp. Outside marriage you're free to choose whoever you want. Women can pick best sellers. Males can get more women.
Within marriage, single males and ugly feminazis make the rules. Suddenly we got this strange one on one life time pairing. Females can only pick singles even though singles are singles for a reason.
Another purpose of marriage is to destroy financial wealth of rich men. It's like holocaust and genocide. It's far easier for rich men to seduce women by just paying for it rather than go through all the bullshit of love, romance, and other nonsense. Of course, if that's allowed than the poor won't get any. Why would rich men want to get married? That's why anti prostitution laws kick in.
Another purpose of marriage is racism. Whites don't want to mix with afghanistan women. However, they would do so if that's the only women left. So we have laws against importing women from poorer countries, against strengthening marriage.
Purpose of marriage in western civilization: Ration mates in equal share for everyone.
In muslim countries, they may have other purposes I am not familiar with. Basically it gives the powah of the pimp to the mullah. The message is the same. They, rather than you, decide who you end up mating with.
This is the most idiotic comment I have ever read in wickedfire.
What is sexist? Am I sexist if I just wanna bang chicks rather than dudes? We are all sexists. Our parents are sexist. If they aren't then you wouldn't exist. Think about it.
How in the fucking earth a wife deserve half of her husband's wealth? Who decide? You?
Why 50%? Why not 49? Why not 48? What's so awesome about number .5?
Actually this is the core of what marriage is all about. Nonsense opinion, or irrational beliefs of bigot govern your relationship. Someone believe that the girl deserve half of your wealth and somehow that's what the deal is. Another person believe that women shouldn't marry men with different race/religion and somehow it's that person, rather than the women, that can decide who she ended up with.
Men are not equally rich, and women are not equally pretty, and somehow, the "fair" price is half of the men's wealth.
I mean, what's the fair price of a chair? Well, it varies right. Depending on the quality of the chair. The wealth of the buyers don't usually matter a lot though buyers tend to buy more expensive chairs. What's the fair price of a car? Same thing. Usually richer guys buy more expensive cars. Richer guys do not pay more for the same car. It doesn't make sense. If anything, richer guys have more cars.
Imagine if car sellers sell cars proportional to the man's wealth? That car sellers will lose businesses quickly. The same way, women wanting half of billionaires' wealth will have far harder time to get billionaires. Settle for $100 per session or $100k per baby no matter how rich the man is, and she'll be getting better deals. Somehow this more market based deals are prohibited.
If anything, richer men should pay less than poor men. Women already prefer the rich even if the richer men offer the same $100 per fuck. Why does the rich has to offer $1k and the poor offer less? Why not let the pussy choose?
Finally something I agree with. Pussy doesn't mean vagina. Pussy means women. Because that's all she's about. I wouldn't hire any women that don't realize she's a pussy. Such women can work somewhere else.
And yes I am learning something. Everybody wants to be the pimp. The real pimps are much more preferred by hot babes. That's why we have so many laws against pimping. To kick out rich better more efficient pimps that actually give hoes/wives/womyn/women/whatevver and johns/husbands/men what they really want rather than what societies say what they should want.
you do know that she got away with so much of Tiger's money, he could have used that money to bang 100 times more whores than he did, and probably even buy each one of them a house with a pool.
Oh wait a minute. I am the only one serious here? Everybody knows I am right but make standard feminist nonsense? Like usual. Yea, I know everyone is smart.
Sorry guys. I honestly thought you mean it when you said that OP doesn't make sense. There are people in 21st century that actually think like that you know.
By the way is faceblogerine really faceblogger wife and that eskimoswife is really eskimos' girl friend?
I mean, they're hilarious. It's a joke too right saying you're going to fuck someone else right where hubby can see it?
Tiger wood act as any male would do. Why have one beautiful girl if you can have 100? In fact, beauty has "optimum". Most beautiful women are just average faced women. You can never be too rich though.
Choose me Facebloggerine. You won't be my punch bag. You'll be my fuck toy, which is much better.
I guess faceblogger pays more. Well, let's check your quality first shall we?