Fox News Lies Again...



oxymoron much?

Yes, you've successfully debunked me.

I can give 2 shits less what religion (or lack thereof) a band embraces. Tool, NIN & Live are 3 of my favorites of all time ... to the best of my knowledge all 3 are atheist.

Cool, I can give 2 shits about what you give 2 shits about.

You do this in every thread you're involved in, including starting the fight in the one below. Here you're even called out by a fellow atheist.

Yes, I started that fight, you really did your research on that one. Good job. You're victorious again. :waves white flag:

Damn, even a fellow atheist got me. I'm surely defeated.

The new atheists members here you fucktard

Oh.... now I know what you mean.... but I still don't care to respond. :still waving flag, is he catching on?:

Another English lesson ... "Preaching to the choir" is trying to make believers out of people who already believe. We (Wickedfire) hate people who shove religion down other people's throat which is why we (Wickedfire) hate you for doing it with atheism.

You mean me preaching to the theists? That's actually not preaching to the choir. Teacher fails class. Student couldn't care less.

There's you, S3per, hellblazer, maybe a couple others that really have an issue with me. (at least with my lack of belief in their belief system) Most others back me up consistently. And IRONY you all cast the first stones.

I really think you just need to get laid or get a hobby ... take your pick but it sounds like your mom might have beaten you with a cross one too many times.

You win, I'm inferior.

I lose. You win.

I'm sick of going line by line back and forth. :still waiving flag:
 
Believe what you want, but abortion really isn't a big issue in the senate. Compromises will be made and health care reform will pass whether you like it or not.

I think you underestimate the cowardice of politicians on both side of the aisle. All they care about is getting elected to another term. The bluedogs will not pass a Taxpayer Funded Abortion in the Health Bill. The liberals, they have no backbones so I see your point that it may still pass if the liberals just go for anything to say they did.

But right now the liberals are barking about not voting for the bill if it does not allow taxpayer funded abortions.
 
There's you, S3per, hellblazer, maybe a couple others that really have an issue with me. (at least with my lack of belief in their belief system) Most others back me up consistently. And IRONY you all cast the first stones.

I don't have an issue with you at all. I actually try to ignore you as much as possible because I find you so obnoxious and annoying, but it's hard when you post 30 times per thread.
 
So you don't find it a bit hypocritical to support abstinence until marriage, when you yourself did not follow it? Cut the hyperbole on fisting seminars. You know as well as I do that abstinence-only education in today's day and age has done nothing but make people uneducated on how to be safe.

Teen Birth Rates Higher in Highly Religious States | LiveScience

I don't think we have enough data nationwide to make determinations on the efficacy of abstinence education. Ideally, I don't think the government should have any role in telling children or teens about anything sexually related. The whole thing is kind of creepy. The whole "they're gonna do it anyways, so let's 'educate' them" was clearly a slippery slope which climaxed(pardon the pun) in Kevin Jennings' nice little experiment.

Then again, I would prefer that all schools be privately-run with low enough costs that virtually all children could attend them. Anything the government touches generally turns to shit, with the exception of the military(although look at what that's becoming now).

But that would eliminate a voting bloc for the Dems, so we can't have that, can we? Might as well keep pouring tax-dollars into a proverbial black hole and keep whining about how teachers are underpaid.

The hypocrisy argument is a tired and one that's been flogged to death. I suppose people can't support the war in Iraq without being in the military either, right? Or one can't support saving people from burning fires without joining the local fire rescue branch? Or perhaps I should go work at the local nuclear power plant, since I advocate for nuclear power too?
 
I don't think we have enough data nationwide to make determinations on the efficacy of abstinence education. Ideally, I don't think the government should have any role in telling children or teens about anything sexually related. The whole thing is kind of creepy. The whole "they're gonna do it anyways, so let's 'educate' them" was clearly a slippery slope which climaxed(pardon the pun) in Kevin Jennings' nice little experiment.

Then again, I would prefer that all schools be privately-run with low enough costs that virtually all children could attend them. Anything the government touches generally turns to shit, with the exception of the military(although look at what that's becoming now).

But that would eliminate a voting bloc for the Dems, so we can't have that, can we? Might as well keep pouring tax-dollars into a proverbial black hole and keep whining about how teachers are underpaid.

The hypocrisy argument is a tired and one that's been flogged to death. I suppose people can't support the war in Iraq without being in the military either, right? Or one can't support saving people from burning fires without joining the local fire rescue branch? Or perhaps I should go work at the local nuclear power plant, since I advocate for nuclear power too?

How is the hypocrisy argument tired? Practice what you preach. Supporting nuclear power is totally different because you may not have the knowhow to operate something like that, but I'd sure hope you know how to operate your own dick.
 
I don't have an issue with you at all. I actually try to ignore you as much as possible because I find you so obnoxious and annoying, but it's hard when you post 30 times per thread.

Believe me, the obnoxious and annoying bit is mutual...

[HERE'S THE TRUE STORY]

I simply started an atheist music thread (I had zero intentions of debating atheism)... I posted music...others were posting "music"...you cast the very first stone in this ENTIRE shit storm. I then make a response. (If you found my taste in music offensive you could have easily "turned the other cheek" and simply not have clicked on my thread)

Just as you find my atheist music post offensive I could have just as easily found your Christian music thread offensive.

Thread continues....next stone cast by Nostalgae, then another by you, then another by S3PER.

Deliguy comes in and acts totally Christ-like in his actions (you guys should look up to him). He contributes.

In the meantime, while I'm responding to all the stones cast upon me. Deliguy creates an entirely different thread titled Good Christian Bands. I make a post making everyone aware that there is now a new thread for Christian Bands. (I end up making several CONTRIBUTIONS here and here....myself to this new Christian Band Thread, I actually contributed to your side, so novel.)

After.... I've politely made people aware of the Christian thread and have responded to S3PER, you, nostalgae and another guy...rusky who cast his very own first stone here......I take a break.



(That was round one) I cast zero first stones. I simply posted music and responded to posts made.



Rusky and you cast two more stones during my "break".

Several more (non controversial) posts are made, it's calm for awhile....the theists are absent.

Rusky and you step in again. Two more stones thrown. (At any time you guys could have simply stopped.)

It's mostly Rusky for the rest of page 2......



(End of round/page 2...........) Again, zero first stones cast. I'm simply responding to you guys entering my thread.



Page 3...first disruptor to enter....you. YOU MAKE AT LEAST TEN POSTS ON THIS PAGE. (so at this point you fucking for sure are not ignoring me, like you're quoted above^^^) I'm not going to hyper every post here.... I'm already putting in 15x the effort I need to.

Which takes us to the fourth page which is dominated by S3PER.


So basically, HELLBLAZER, NOSTALGAE, S3PER, RUSKY, you're the ones that are intolerant of my beliefs. (Otherwise, you guys could have ALL acted like a true Christian and "turned the other cheek", right? WWJD? )

Why would you have made all these posts if you find me so obnoxious and annoying. Just stay out of the thread...if you see any more of my atheist posts outside of this thread (just as I could come across one of your Christian posts) you can still......"turn the other cheek" Again, WWJD? (I'm not making a joke about WWJD, but seriously)

The truth is.... you were being obnoxious and annoying (all of you) to me and my thread.

You guys totally invaded it.

I'm sure I have other atheist posts strewn about other threads that you can find (a lot of them mere responses however, just like ones in the atheist thread where I've been challenged), but they're mostly relevant and make decent points.

You guys make yourselves out to be the fucking victims when you invaded my thread.

And it turns out you guys are the most intolerant of all and the least Christ-Like.

So please stop the hypocrisy. The truth is.... I can actually tolerate Christianity and every other religion while at the same time VIGOROUSLY debating for atheism (when challenged).......on the other hand you guys have zero tolerance for atheism while totally lacking the ability to argue for your own belief system.
 
How is the hypocrisy argument tired? Practice what you preach. Supporting nuclear power is totally different because you may not have the knowhow to operate something like that, but I'd sure hope you know how to operate your own dick.

I was never preaching anything, dickwad. I was supporting Palin's right to support it, since apparently that's the worst accusation you've been able to dig up on her. You've been regurgitating that talking point about her over and over again, and considering how the media parachuted legions of muckrakers into Wasilla to terrorize her children, I'd say that's a boon to her that that's the best you guys could get on her.
 
I was never preaching anything, dickwad. I was supporting Palin's right to support it, since apparently that's the worst accusation you've been able to dig up on her. You've been regurgitating that talking point about her over and over again, and considering how the media parachuted legions of muckrakers into Wasilla to terrorize her children, I'd say that's a boon to her that that's the best you guys could get on her.

It's not the worst accusation, I could come up with more arguments. I just don't want someone with a preachy moralistic attitude in office. Religion and government should not mix. Period. Palin has every right to support it, but it's a bit fucking ironic that if she preached it with her own daughter, it sure didn't work.
 
It's not the worst accusation, I could come up with more arguments. I just don't want someone with a preachy moralistic attitude in office. Religion and government should not mix. Period. Palin has every right to support it, but it's a bit fucking ironic that if she preached it with her own daughter, it sure didn't work.

Government and health care don't mix either...

Neither do government and school or a shit load of other stuff that they seem to think they are entitled to control.

So, now we will be fined and possibly jailed if we don't get health insurance like Uncle Obama has instructed us to do?

If we speak bad about him, he might add us to his list?

some of you are really fucking retarded. I'm convinced you are either dead broke or just brain dead.
 
So I physically clicked all of those links and this is the worst I can come up with

Simply put, you're a tool.

Some atheists are bearable in an argument and can understand points on each side. Most, like yourself, are stubborn and pompous, and pointless to argue with.

From your posts you just seem to want to point out so badly that you're atheist and better than all non-atheists, you just come off like a jackass trying to "team up" with fake friends on the internet to make yourself feel more confident that you believe in nothing.

Almost all of that is referring to YOU, not Atheism or atheists. All the stats pointed out by hellblazer & rusky (who kicks ass by the way) are statements of fact. It's not in any way, shape or form bashing. You WILL get rebuttles to arguments around here, but you're relatively new so perhaps you didn't know we all have opinions about everything.

I feel bad for atheists actually, from what I've seen they're generally the most sad and lost group of people out there...ironic.

And then Paul says this. Borderline bashing, I'll concede your point with that link.

I'm trying to find more "overt" god free music. More like militant atheist music, lol, or religion bashing.

I need some good religion bashing music.

But it's pretty clear what your attitude is and it really shows. This is my entire point on this thread. Christians (around here) aren't the type to force feed you their religion. I can't say the same for you and your (lack of) beliefs.

And when you use the acronym WWJD on WF it refers to Jon, not JC.

Finally, threadjacking is a part of wickedfire, deal with it. You don't get to have "your" thread to do what you want. We shit everywhere but we do it intelligently without angst (unless it's turbo talking about women's rights, fucking feminists). Read through her posts and find out how to support atheism intelligently.
 
Religion and government should not mix. Period.

Simplistic and impossible, if not fascist. Do we say, atheism and government should not mix? Both are belief-based ideologies. Logic, facts and statistics should be the benchmark, not some bigoted bias towards somebody's religion.

You were doing fine when arguing the efficacy of abstinence as a policy. But to argue against a policy simply because the person advocating it adheres to a particular religion is bigoted and closedminded.

The Constitution said there shall be no establishment of religion. That also means there should be no disestablishment of religion. And the 'separation of church and state' which you hear piously bandied about so often, while not actually in the Constitution, was Jefferson's creation specifically warning against the government persecuting adherents of a specific religion. The kind of persecution, I might add, whose shadows temporarily emerged in the language of discriminating rhetoric you just displayed.

Both you and Palin no doubt want similar things; to reduce the teenage pregnancy rate. You simply differ on how to go about it. Take away your prejudice towards her religious beliefs and you'd find the two of you have a lot more in common than you probably think.