Confused Believer

And as for those who feel that Atheist extremism (lol!) is even in the same ballpark or hemisphere even with reglious extremism

You act like they should just sit on the sidelines and let everyone go on their marry way.

Everyone has an agenda to an extent. Passionate athiests are 100x more common than passionate christians when looked as a % of the whole. It should be easy pickings for you guys. Major fail since the non-passionate christians hide behind ignorance and devotion. You guys should be having one for lunch daily.

I may not be an athiest like most of WF but I'm also not here to spread my religion.

Most sane people devote time to things we have influence over. The mental masturbation over the menaing of life is fun and all but proof isn't going so well for either side. That reduces it to simply an argument.


The jews have officially infiltrated the christian vs athiest argument. Game over, everyone loses.
 



I'm pretty sure you're posting this as a cute joke, but nevertheless...

Einstein was devout when he was young (Einstein's autobiography covers this in length) - the ONLY thing that proves is even the smartest of humans were once a malleable young mind prone to the influence(in this case constricting and silly thoughts) of authority.

Lucky for us... Einstein grew up, here's what he had to say once he did.

The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weakness, the Bible a collection of honorable, but still purely primitive, legends which are nevertheless pretty childish. No interpretation no matter how subtle can (for me) change this. -Einstein (Grown up and wiser)
src. Letters of Note: The word God is the product of human weakness
 
While you guys are growing up. Were trying to cure cancer.
Leading Scientist in the field; happens to be a Christian. (Francis Collins)

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLB2zGA81Lk"]Eye To Eye: Mapping Cancer - YouTube[/ame]
 
I'm pretty sure you're posting this as a cute joke, but nevertheless...

Einstein was devout when he was young (Einstein's autobiography covers this in length) - the ONLY thing that proves is even the smartest of humans were once a malleable young mind prone to the influence(in this case constricting and silly thoughts) of authority.

Lucky for us... Einstein grew up, here's what he had to say once he did.

src. Letters of Note: The word God is the product of human weakness

Years ago, when I actually gave two shits about discussions like this, I researched Einstein's personal beliefs long and hard. You're just scratching the surface with that one.

Here's a curveball for you:

"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."

I've concluded that Einsten was most likely a deist.

"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings."
 
While you guys are growing up. Were trying to cure cancer.
Leading Scientist in the field; happens to be a Christian. (Francis Collins)

Eye To Eye: Mapping Cancer - YouTube

You're not curing fucking anything. Francis Collins might be, but don't think for a second just because you belong to a group of people that their acheivements somehow pass on to you via proxy. Or maybe you'd like to compare yourself in the same league as the Westboro Baptist church since you're going down that route?

There are plenty of Atheists doing similar things because they WANT TO HELP not because they are scared of going to hell if they don't.

I wonder, is Francis Collins using science to try and cure cancer, or is he using miracles like jesus did?.

Isn't it hilarious that he's having to spend his life curing a genetic mutation that, according to your religion, God must have created in the first place.


You talk about genecidal maniacs and try and pin the reasoning behind why they killed so many people on their inherent lack of belief of a god, yet it was your God who created them this way according to your doctrine.

Out of all the billions of people in the world who have existed and died due to genetic diseases, viruses, bacteria and 'evil', if your god created all these things in the first place then i think its clear who the biggest mass murderer is.
 
While you guys are growing up. Were trying to cure cancer.
Leading Scientist in the field; happens to be a Christian. (Francis Collins)

LOL, why do have a need to divide society up into black or white groups? I'm sure Collins has plenty of colleagues that are atheist or follow other religions, but they probably spend the same amount of time thinking about that as they do thinking about what brand of underwear they all wear.
 
touché

Years ago, when I actually gave two shits about discussions like this, I researched Einstein's personal beliefs long and hard. You're just scratching the surface with that one.

Here's a curveball for you:

"In view of such harmony in the cosmos which I, with my limited human mind, am able to recognize, there are yet people who say there is no God. But what really makes me angry is that they quote me for the support of such views."

I've concluded that Einsten was most likely a deist.

"I believe in Spinoza's God who reveals himself in the orderly harmony of what exists, not in a God who concerns himself with fates and actions of human beings."

As someone who spent way too much time on this as well, even reading Spinoza's papers - I believe Einstein was Agnostic or Pantheist, in Pantheism, 'God' is interchangeable with 'Universe'.

Einstein responded on September 28, 1949:
I have repeatedly said that in my opinion the idea of a personal God is a childlike one. You may call me an agnostic, but I do not share the crusading spirit of the professional atheist whose fervor is mostly due to a painful act of liberation from the fetters of religious indoctrination received in youth. I prefer an attitude of humility corresponding to the weakness of our intellectual understanding of nature and of our own being.

I just prefer to slice off the fat with Occam's Razor and leave it at the universe exists and we don't need the word 'God' anywhere in there to confuse the masses who still believe in a personal God.
 
I have learned that one does not learn in church that science and faith are mutually exclusive.

- Dwight iPad:Tapatalk

I got a little lost with the double negative paired with the one affirmative , but I think I got the gist. Most liberal churchs, like the UU's for example, incorporate faith and science or "head and heart". I still find it to be a bunch of hooey, but the cookies are nice.
 
As someone who spent way too much time on this as well, even reading Spinoza's papers - I believe Einstein was Agnostic or Pantheist, in Pantheism, 'God' is interchangeable with 'Universe'.

I just prefer to slice off the fat with Occam's Razor and leave it at the universe exists and we don't need the word 'God' anywhere in there to confuse the masses who still believe in a personal God.

He didn't believe in a personal God, that much is true. There's plenty of quotes from him expressing his disdain for the idea of a personal God. He didn't believe in the bible or the common Christian idea of God, that is obvious.

I'm not an atheist. I don't think I can call myself a pantheist. The problem involved is too vast for our limited minds. We are in the position of a little child entering a huge library filled with books in many languages. The child knows someone must have written those books. It does not know how. It does not understand the languages in which they are written. The child dimly suspects a mysterious order in the arrangement of the books but doesn't know what it is. That, it seems to me, is the attitude of even the most intelligent human being toward God.
It's difficult to put a finger on his beliefs because he understood that there's so much we still don't know. And I agree with him.

I still don't understand how people can fervently subscribe to either side of the coin when so much still remains a mystery.

-----------
<rant>

Which is why religious discussions on the internet are a field of dead horses. It's like arguing about the answer to a math problem which we haven't seen yet. I could say 5, someone else could say 2, and some guy in China could say 97. And all we're really doing is making a guess.

Until we know the numbers involved, how can anyone intelligently conclude the answer?

Maybe I'm just sick of seeing it, people picking sides and then throwing stones at each other. I mean really, grow up already. I wouldn't have posted in here but Chianti started hurling dog shit at Eli for believing in God - that really struck a nerve with me. Who does that? The year is 2012, hello.

Instead of thinking of how we're divided, just remember. One common thing unites us all: Gay Webmastery.

And never forget it.
</rant>

400px-Double-alaskan-rainbow.jpg
 
I don't have a problem with religious people, as long as they don't force beliefs or harm others, but I still hate religions because they are medieval belief systems that are divisive and cause people to do evil things.

But do you know that Atheists also commit violence against religious people?

In today's world no one except Muslims is going to harm you in the name of religion. If you talk about the exceptional situations from other religions then look at the violence of atheism too.

Most of the atheists I know in real life don't have enough moral values compared to religious people as they don't fear sin. Let's hypercritically say god does not exist, still religious people are better as they fear to do bad things to some extent at least. (I am not including Muslims)
 
Last edited:
LOL, why do have a need to divide society up into black or white groups? I'm sure Collins has plenty of colleagues that are atheist or follow other religions, but they probably spend the same amount of time thinking about that as they do thinking about what brand of underwear they all wear.

I'm not the one dividing. Reading through most arguments; atheists assert they're the only beings with reason and understanding of science.
 
> I wouldn't have posted in here but Chianti started
> hurling dog shit at Eli for believing in God

I didn't hurl anything. I said that I'd distrust a religionist more than someone who was not a religionist, and I'd think twice before doing business with them.

Imagine you were going to do business with someone (where there is a possibility of losing your investment or where they could do harm to your brand/properties/reputation). Suppose you found out during a conversation that this person believed in The Power Of The Force from Starwars. Not just superficially or metaphorically, but that 'The Force' permeated and affected their perspective of the world, and their decisions and actions.

What about if you discovered your business partner truly believed in 'the law of attraction' from 'The Secret', and it was affecting the decisions he was making. When you are facing dwindling ROI his answer to the problem was that everything would be OK if you just 'concentrate hard enough and visualise being rich'.

Anyone who claims that this kind of thing would not make you think twice about dealing with these people is either lying or stupid.

So why would I trust someone who believes in angels, demons and intercessory prayer, and who lets these superstitious delusions inform their life?

I also said I'd respect someone less for holding these beliefs, which is perfectly true. I think people who haven't shaken off their childhood indoctrination have a defect that I cannot respect. I can be courteous and try to ignore it, but I cannot feel respect.
 
Did I mention I'm too old for this shit now? Why can't I just stay the fuck away??

Out of all the billions of people in the world who have existed and died due to genetic diseases, viruses, bacteria and 'evil', if your god created all these things in the first place then i think its clear who the biggest mass murderer is.
Ouch. That there is some painful medicine... Sure to fall on deaf ears, but felt it was worth a shout out anyway.

I have often wondered how the religious could just sweep all of the evil their god does under the rug without a second thought... I know some can blame it on Satan but the ones who believe in free will, the majority these days, must believe that God created us to live in pain and wanted it that way. So my question is: Is this possible because they have cognitive failure (classic Denial) and choose not to see, or is it something that they recognize on some level and still tell themselves: "Well, the world has lots of great stuff in it too like sugar, love, and alcohol, so overall it's still a net Gain for me."

If the latter, hollywood-induced view is the case, how can they still be so shallow and not weight ALL of mankind's pains versus god instead of just their own?


As someone who spent way too much time on this as well, even reading Spinoza's papers - I believe Einstein was Agnostic or Pantheist, in Pantheism, 'God' is interchangeable with 'Universe'.
+1 for Pantheist. Even in his Maths he seems to see the universe as his god.


Wrong (according to Denzel Washington) Atheists are killers and sociopaths.
Geez Turbo, don't you know that people like Rusky will take this as serious evidence for their side of the argument? Thanks a lot... :mad:


Most of the atheists I know in real life don't have enough moral values compared to religious people as they don't fear sin. Let's hypercritically say god does not exist, still religious people are better as they fear to do bad things to some extent at least.
Please tell me this isn't your reasoning behind your religious stance... It's so full of holes that you could use it for a net.

Setting aside the fact that it could easily be argued that religious people have done more evil IN THE NAME of God than atheists have done, it also says terrible things about the underlying drive of a people who are AFRAID OF REPERCUSSION and use that fear as the only reason to have a nice society.

Which nice, quiet, civil society would you rather live in:

A.) One where everyone is afraid that if they step out of line they'll be tortured to death in horrible, unspeakable ways...

B.) One where everyone has been well educated to come to the conclusion that following the Golden Rule is in everyone's best interest.

I'm holding out for B, thanks.

And yes, I know you're going to think that B would be less likely to occur than A because of the unstable element among atheists, but it doesn't make A a nice world nonetheless. Fuck A. It needs to be rebelled against. It should be burned down, every single time.


I'm not the one dividing. Reading through most arguments; atheists assert they're the only beings with reason and understanding of science.
I don't believe you'll find those words anywhere on this thread or any others I've taken part in around here.

You've read too much into our insults & playfulness.

People of any belief can become extremely smart. We'd have to be retarded to say that a Christian can't become good or even advanced at science. Clearly there are many leading scientists with faith of some kind.

We would, however, say that it must make it more difficult for you guys to attain any advanced level of science, especially in the branch of Biology where clearly every drive behind our growth is Evolution. Just like how it would have been hard for a Christian to discover other planets not revolving around Earth back during the inquisition. Religion Sometimes causes roadblocks.

I don't see any atheists around here making blanket statements... Only cause & effect instances. You on the other hand...
 
Most of the atheists I know in real life don't have enough moral values compared to religious people as they don't fear sin. Let's hypercritically say god does not exist, still religious people are better as they fear to do bad things to some extent at least. (I am not including Muslims)

Most unsupported statement in this thread so far. Infact the evidence is to the contrary:

Population data of prisoners by religious belief

Judeo-Christian 83.761%
Atheist 0.209%

The results of the Christians vs atheists in prison investigation.


Atheists don't require a mythological being to beat us into being good, most of us are smart enough to figure out that being good reaps it's own rewards. (Although maybe that explains why the religious extremists tend to have lower IQs)
 
In today's world no one except Muslims is going to harm you in the name of religion.

Christian Group Behind Attempt to Have Gays Murdered in Uganda Latest Developments Jan 2011 Murders have Started! - Premier Christian Community


Norweigan mass killer Anders Breivik says he is sane | thetelegraph.com.au



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rKE5WJKvzI0&feature=relmfu"]In the Name of the Lord - Uganda - YouTube[/ame]



Let's hypercritically say god does not exist, still religious people are better as they fear to do bad things to some extent at least. (I am not including Muslims)
This line of thinking might make sense on the surface, but there is no correlation between atheists and higher crime, and actually the "Bible Belt" tends to have higher crime rates.

Muslims as a whole are more strict about "bad" things that they are not suppose to do. Alcohol and porn are banned in many Islamic nations, for example.
 
We would, however, say that it must make it more difficult for you guys to attain any advanced level of science, especially in the branch of Biology where clearly every drive behind our growth is Evolution. Just like how it would have been hard for a Christian to discover other planets not revolving around Earth back during the inquisition. Religion Sometimes causes roadblocks.

I don't see any atheists around here making blanket statements... Only cause & effect instances. You on the other hand...


You just did it right there.
I can get documented information that states the opposite. Let me know if you want links.
Your statement is horse shit.
 
You just did it right there.
I can get documented information that states the opposite. Let me know if you want links.
Your statement is horse shit.


Links please. I'd love to see how your religion fully supports the scientific evidence of evolution, and more importantly, i'd love to see what documentation there is in the bible regarding it.

And since your on the topic and seem willing to share, i'd be interested to see what you think religion said about the planets and our position in the cosmos 'back in the day'.