Me said:The only thing you should be asking yourself when you feel like a beer is if it is the best beverage to do the job of quenching your thirst or getting you buzzing. (Unless there is some 3rd reason to drink one I'm not aware of.)
Why? Because all desires are put there by others. So if you discard desire, then you can make the SMARTEST decisions.
Exhibit A, everyone. :music07:You must drink shitty beer. Newsflash, good beer tastes fucking good, in fact it tastes great!
justo_tx: Did you just not understand the point, or are you purposefully defending the commercials that sold you that beer you love so much?
Short of building a mud hut, growing your own vegetables and slaughtering your own livestock consumables cannot be separated from their marketing.
The "shitty beer" comment wasn't based on branding (read my above statement again), if you put three random beers in front of us with no labels are you under the impression you or I wouldn't be able to decide on a personal preference without the input a brand mascot or spokesperson? Would you refuse to participate because beer is neither the optimal thirst quencher nor the most efficient alcoholic delivery medium (you see how taking shit like this to the extreme can become absurd)?
You can stand in front of an aisle in grocery store for hours trying to figure out if the profits of purchasing Brand A will eventually line the pockets of the Rothschilds or if the softness of Brand B is worth the implication the Paris Hilton is a successful spokesperson but sooner or later you're gonna have to pick a roll of toilet paper and get on with your life.
Yes they can. All you have to do is decide which consumable is the best you can based on logic, not desire. All it really takes is knowing that the desire is fake, and the products' usefulness is all that matters.Short of building a mud hut, growing your own vegetables and slaughtering your own livestock consumables cannot be separated from their marketing.
No, I'm under the impression that you're already playing their game the way they want you to play it if you're ever in such a situation.... if you put three random beers in front of us with no labels are you under the impression you or I wouldn't be able to decide on a personal preference without the input a brand mascot or spokesperson?
Not absurd.Would you refuse to participate because beer is neither the optimal thirst quencher nor the most efficient alcoholic delivery medium (you see how taking shit like this to the extreme can become absurd)?
I don't give a fuck about rothschilds and conspiracies and blood diamonds and all that crap... I just try to be practical. -And doing what marketers tell you to do is the opposite of practicality.You can stand in front of an aisle in grocery store for hours trying to figure out if the profits of purchasing Brand A will eventually line the pockets of the Rothschilds or if the softness of Brand B is worth the implication the Paris Hilton is a successful spokesperson but sooner or later you're gonna have to pick a roll of toilet paper and get on with your life.
Boy have you just identified yourself. :action-smiley-052:I'm going to be honest: I've been reading a lot of your comments (as well as LukeP's) and quite frankly, LukeP is nowhere near as smart as he thinks he is and you've steadily been the voice of reason.
Jeez man, wake up...
Beer is NOT the best at getting you drunk; some Bacardi 151 would do the job far faster & cheaper.
No, but you might indeed start choosing your purchases for the right reasons... Like me.If I wake up will I refrain from using marketing implanted brand names in place of generic alternatives when trying to make a point like you?
Exhibit B.Whiskey would have worked, grain alcohol as well, but no, you single out Bacardi 151 as a better way to get blitzed. Somewhere a Bacarding Marketing VP is smiling.
Lukep and others, yes even the haters, thank you really much for your contribution to my "soul searching" shit. I really do mean it.
By owning a "house" I meant more a "place" that would serve as home for my family.
I am really afraid that now when I am young with some cash in my pocket and don't have a family, I am all about:"Fuck this, fuck that, fuck 'em all", but when I'll have kids then I will look back and just say:"That was me when I was young, oh those days..." and go to the shop for the next sale.
I am afraid that all my beliefs that I have now will just vanish later in my life. I am afraid that I will just lose all my personality and betray myself and burn out on booze or drugs trying to overcome that I "sold out" to major society.
Fuuuuuuck (in Sid Vicious' voice), this shit is so confusing.
Yeah, I know what you mean. There is an extra bit of love for the bitters around here... I can't deny I've enjoyed some myself.lukep, I do agree with you on many things, but gotta say, I think beer was probably the absolute WORST possible example you could have used, especially on a board like this. Even for me, a guy who agrees with you, I'm thinking, "fuck off, and leave my beer out of it!".
This is kind of an extreme example that I personally think most here would already agree with. Although it serves the purpose of the example well, I guess I was afraid of using such an example because most peeps here already feel that they know better than to buy a $600 pair of specs and therefore feel that they know WHY they wouldn't pay $600 for them... Not attributing it to the marketing's influence, instead thinking it's "just common sense" not to pay $600 for sunglasses.Take sunglasses. That would have been a good example. You don't need a $600 pair of Oakley's, but loads of people still by them, because it thinks it makes them special and cool. They do the exact same thing as a cheap $30 pair, but nonetheless, people will still buy the $600 pairs.
I'm sorry, did I come off as someone who doesn't want to leave them be?Although I agree with what you're saying about a lot of consumer products being useless, the fact that people buy shit to make them happy is the reason you get paid on a daily basis, so might as well let them be.
So be honored my brother, you're one of the chosen few that can understand the point... Meanwhile 99% of this planet is just a bunch of sheep to farm money out of and it can be quite lonely for us few since you can't talk to a sheep and have it understand.
?
Everything you've been bashing more or less provides actual value to the consumer. It's fairly apparent that you just seem to hate everything to do with modern society, probably because you've been influenced by people who try to make you hate it, and it clearly worked.
I have seen nothing on this thread that bashes capitalism. I'm all for it myself. It's this Jones-chasing society that happened to grow up around it that we detest... Which is 100% a result of Freud's realization that people buy with their irrational feelings. (The reason we push "Benefits, not Features.")Given the current environment, capitalism is good.
Freud is extremely outdated, and I'm not a person that enjoys materialism to any extent unless for utility to achieve a set objective by any means. I also am not discrediting the history provided in the video but talk the central idea it derives from with a grain of salt.
I just can't believe anyone could equate things like high speed internet and air conditioning to what we are complaining about. You sound like you read a 1-sentence brochure about anti-materialism and came here for some reason to try to argue against it with really shallow assumptions. :disgust:Just do something instead of talking up a storm while sitting in your air conditioned house with high speed internet and while eating food with all the fixings.