The Cure for Cancer

[pinchyfingers]

China Study

And I'm pretty sure it is not bullshit, some dude tried to talk shit, but they came back with refutations for everything and tore him apart.

 

[lcver]

The cure for cancer is drinking 1 teaspoon of baking soda once per week.

The baking soda increases the blood alkalinity to where the cancer tumor cannot survive.

Having alkaline blood also has many other benifits.

 

[lose lose win]

The cure for cancer is drinking 1 teaspoon of baking soda once per week.

The baking soda increases the blood alkalinity to where the cancer tumor cannot survive.

Having alkaline blood also has many other benifits.

You're on the wrong WF forum

 

[nickycakes]

Cancer cells are NOT fueled by sugar. Diet does NOTHING to speed up or slow down cancer growth.

This myth was perpetuated by a chain email claiming to be from Johns Hopkins. It got so bad that Johns Hopkins Medicine actually devoted an entire section of their website to it:

Cancer Update Email -- It's a Hoax!


Again, sugar does NOT cure or slow down the spread of cancer. Spreading this misinformation could actually kill people, just like the bullshit vaccine autism nonsense.

You know why doctors use chemotherapy? Because it fucking works.

Source: Me having had cancer and having it cured by chemotherapy.

 

[lose lose win]

Cancer cells are NOT fueled by sugar.

Good thing, because you are by FAR the biggest kool aid drinking motherfucker that I've ever encountered.

Diet does NOTHING to speed up or slow down cancer growth.

Yes, I'm sure inflammation, cellular degradation, and a RIDICULOUSLY huge amount of simple carbs in the average American diet are not related in any way whatsoever. I'm also sure the chemical contaminants that we consume daily do absolutely nothing to the cells in our bodies.

This myth was perpetuated by a chain email claiming to be from Johns Hopkins. It got so bad that Johns Hopkins Medicine actually devoted an entire section of their website to it:

How the fuck do you know how this "myth" was perpetuated? You think maybe there could be other contributing factors?

You know why doctors use chemotherapy? Because it fucking works.

Of course it works... it kills every fucking cell it comes in contact with. It's like using an atom bomb for a roach infestation.

Source: Me having had cancer and having it cured by chemotherapy.

Sorry to hear about your condition and glad you pulled through... but in no way does that make you a reputable source. I'm sure there's some retarded kid somewhere that survived brain surgery, shall I reference him when I'm in a debate about the pitfalls of such surgery? Your logic is straight up stunted.

Your're partially right though.. Sugar is NOT the cause of cancer. Fruit is good for you. A diet consisting of inflammatory forms of processed sugars and grains combined with a disturbing amount of toxins and a complete lack of any type of real nourishment absolutely takes it's toll on cellular health.

Source: I'm not a fucking kool aid drinking retard nazi.

 

[nickycakes]

Good thing, because you are by FAR the biggest kool aid drinking motherfucker that I've ever encountered.




Yes, I'm sure inflammation, cellular degradation, and a RIDICULOUSLY huge amount of simple carbs in the average American diet are not related in any way whatsoever. I'm also sure the chemical contaminants that we consume daily do absolutely nothing to the cells in our bodies.



How the fuck do you know how this "myth" was perpetuated? You think maybe there could be other contributing factors?



Of course it works... it kills every fucking cell it comes in contact with. It's like using an atom bomb for a roach infestation.



Sorry to hear about your condition and glad you pulled through... but in no way does that make you a reputable fucking source. I'm sure there's some retarded kid somewhere that survived brain surgery, shall I reference him when I'm in a debate about the pitfalls of such surgery? Goddamn your logic is straight up stunted.

Sugar is NOT the cause of cancer. Fruit is good for you. A diet consisting of inflammatory forms of processed sugars and grains combined with a disturbing amount of toxins and a complete lack of any type of real nourishment absolutely takes it's toll on cellular health.

Source: I'm not a fucking kool aid drinking retard nazi.

I've done plenty of research, and I consider legitimate sources like Johns Hopkins Medical to be much more reputable than the link posted in the OP which references a study in which most of the people died or quit so they could get real treatment. Only 5 actually made it through the trial.

Cancer cells feed on the exact same things the rest of the cells in our bodies feed on.

tl;dr: you're a fucking retard.

 

[lose lose win]

I've done plenty of research, and I consider legitimate sources like Johns Hopkins Medical to be much more reputable than the link posted in the OP which references a study in which most of the people died or quit so they could get real treatment. Only 5 actually made it through the trial.

Cancer cells feed on the exact same things the rest of the cells in our bodies feed on.

tl;dr: you're a fucking retard.

Haha... OK, we're both fucking retards. That's established. Now let's be big boys..

I don't have time to get balls deep in this thread but I am interested in your thoughts on a few things..

What about lung cancer caused by smoking? Is it not caused by a toxin/contaminant? Of course it is... So would it not stand to reason that you could extend that same logic into your diet and how it affects other forms of cancer? That would pretty much negate the conclusion you came too after your extensive research no?

We still have a lot to learn about cancer but you'd have to be an idiot to not even think it was possible that our shitty diets could be contributing factors.

Thanks for playing.

 

[nickycakes]

H
What about lung cancer caused by smoking? Is it not caused by a toxin/contaminant? Of course it is... So would it not stand to reason that you could extend that same logic into your diet and how it affects other forms of cancer? That would pretty much negate the conclusion you came too after your extensive research no?

We still have a lot to learn about cancer but you'd have to be an idiot to not even think it was possible that our shitty diets could be contributing factors.

Nobody is debating that a shitty diet may increase your risk for cancer. But a good diet will NOT prevent or cure cancer.

You should have taken a couple minutes to at least scan the link I posted (here it is again)

And here's a relevant quote:

Dietary habits and lifestyle choices, such as smoking, contribute to the development of many human cancers, says Kimmel Cancer Center director William Nelson. Our experts recommend a balanced diet (see response #11) as a way of reducing cancer risk. In terms of supplements, Nelson points out that while they may help mediate vitamin deficiencies, taking doses above what the body needs provides no added benefit.

 

[lose lose win]

You should have taken a couple minutes to at least scan the link I posted (here it is again)

And here's a relevant quote:

Fair enough. Didn't click the link at all. Will read in it's entirety.


But.. This statement makes absolutely no sense:

Nobody is debating that a shitty diet may increase your risk for cancer. But a good diet will NOT prevent or cure cancer.

You're contradicting yourself and proving my point all at once.

Thanks for playing.

 

[nickycakes]

But.. This statement makes absolutely no sense:


You're contradicting yourself and proving my point all at once.

I'm not contradicting myself. A shitty diet can increase your risk for cancer. It will not ensure you get cancer. Same with smoking. Not smoking will not prevent cancer. Nor will quitting smoking cure cancer.

 

[lose lose win]

You are contradicting yourself.

You said a shit diet can cause cancer but a good diet can't prevent it.

Either way.. I don't feel like debating shit tonight. Glad you're a survivor. Good luck and watch what you eat.

 

[Incantation]

Not that I have much experience, but you'd probably fair better with Lycopene and Resveratrol in your diet.

 

[nickycakes]

You are contradicting yourself.

You said a shit diet can cause cancer but a good diet can't prevent it.

Either way.. I don't feel like debating shit tonight. Glad you're a survivor. Good luck and watch what you eat.

That's not contradictory at all. You can eat a perfect diet and not smoke and get pretty much any type of cancer. I'm not sure you know what 'prevent' means.

 

[eliquid]

im far more interested in what the cells in my body feed on, because I feel I could create some new rebills out of that shit

 

[lose lose win]

true or false: If eat a healthy diet I have less chance of getting cancer than if I eat a shitty diet?

 

[eliquid]

^^ neither, its a black box in my belief.

I know plenty of people who eat shitty diets that dont have cancer and plenty who ate fine and did get it.

Too many variables in play like genes, environment, diet, lifestyle, etc that play a part in it to just base your question off diet alone. We dont have a vacuum for that question.

 

[nickycakes]

true or false: If eat a healthy diet I have less chance of getting cancer than if I eat a shitty diet?

Not true or false, it depends on what's in the "shitty" diet. Even if you have less of a chance to get cancer with your healthy diet, it does not PREVENT cancer. You can still get it.

BUT, this debate is about a diet being a viable treatment for existing cancer, which it simply is not, unless part of that diet is edible chemotherapy.

 

[Incantation]

true or false: If eat a healthy diet I have less chance of getting cancer than if I eat a shitty diet?

I think so, but Eliquid is right about other factors at play like...

BBC News - Diesel exhausts do cause cancer, says WHO

 

[lose lose win]

^^ neither, its a black box in my belief.

I know plenty of people who eat shitty diets that dont have cancer and plenty who ate fine and did get it.

Too many variables in play like genes, environment, diet, lifestyle, etc that play a part in it to just base your question off diet alone. We dont have a vacuum for that question.

I could pose the same question and replace "diet" with "genes", "environment", "lifestyle", etc.. and the answer would still be true.

Using your logic if I asked if living next to a nuclear power plant would increase my chances of getting cancer, you'd ask what my diet was like.

 

[eliquid]

^^ wrong bro, you basing getting cancer off 1 variable only, when in fact you have a ton more in play.

Its like a split test. You cant ask that question and expect a solid answer with just 1 variable when many are in play unless you live in a vacuum.

Cancer is something that ANYONE can get at any time for pretty much ANY reason, its not like Sickle Cell Disease or other issues that generally are stemmed from 1 variable only you can not control at all and are predetermined at birth.