As should you.
I'm not trying to convince you, fucktard. Now fuck off.
As should you.
You're equating adults to cell bundles.
Can't we just count the last two thousand years of Christian terror? It was bloody, horrifying and incited MUCH terror. It's amusing to me that because no christians have decided to blow themselves up in the last 20 years (wait that's not quite true though if you count the IRA carbombers now is it) that suddenly this is such an angelic (pun pun???) religion and OH SO MUCH BETTER than it's cousin, Islam.
Insert long and off-topic post.
I'm not trying to convince you, fucktard. Now fuck off.
You know, as much as I hate to admit it, in six short words, you have summed up the whole reason for the existence of Acai/Googlecash/Colon Cleanse rebills.
Damn.
::sigh:: Agree to disagree? Sure dude.
You're equating adults to cell bundles.
Or at the maximum you're equating adults to incompatible with life fetuses.
Actually, I just remembered Tiller did late-term abortions - which makes you doubly retarded. Unless you're so moronic as to actually argue a baby in the third trimester is a 'cell bundle'.
Babies in the third term are only allowed to be legally aborted when they are either incompatible with life (they won't survive outside the womb) or the mother's health is in danger.
Right, in a perfect moronic world like the one you inhabit that would happen. In Tiller's world, he bribed the governor and made millions off of killing babies while she gave him protection. Abortion has always been about money - that's why Planned Parenthood recently changed their business model to increase abortions.
But wait, it's actually about a noble right to 'choose'. Right..
The only thing I meant by this is that all religions have their extremists, there is no sense in pointing at Islam and saying it is the only religion with crazies.
The vast majority of Islamic people aren't terrorists. I'm guessing at least 90% of Islamic people probably condemn the violence.
America is not free of its own religious domestic terrorists. Christian or Muslim.
Christians in America think their own theology is immune from extremists while pointing at the entirety of Islam and saying it's a violent theology.
People are only getting so upset because they're Christians themselves. They don't want to believe that it's possible their theology can somehow create a terrorist. But it can, look at Scott Roeder.
You really give athiest a bad name. Muslims and Christians are apples and oranges. Extremist islam is preached in santioned mosque across the world. Martyrdom is preached as well as praised on thier TV networks etc. The violence and extremism is common in this religeon all throughout the world.
When is the last time you attended a Babtist church and the preacher was preaching about killing the non belivers? When is the last time you turned the TV on and watched a documentary praising the latest Methodist suicide bomber?
All violence commited by a self proclaimed "Christian" is ALWAYS denounced by the Christian churches. Acts of violence commited by the Muslims are often celebrated by millions of Muslims.
Give up on this argument. Your going no where with it.
When is the last time you attended a Babtist church and the preacher was preaching about killing the non belivers?
All this means is the Muslims haven't yet got over the Islamic equivalent of the "Crusades".
Christians for the most part have adapted to modern society, they know they can't get anywhere killing people anymore. They realized it a thousand years ago.
The Christians had their religiously sanctioned military campaigns already. They had them a thousand years ago.
Muslims just happen to be having their religiously sanctioned military campaigns right now in current history.
Muslims will eventually evolve past this (as Christians did) and they too will realize they can't get anywhere killing people.
Once Muslims have adapted you will clearly be able to see that this is an apple to apple comparison.
I just happen to be able to see the apple to apple comparison now instead of later.
The texts of Christianity do not support forced conversion; those of Islam do.
forced conversions to happen in Islam happened in the fucking 12th century. Sunnis were forced to convert to Shi'ism.
This is not entirely true.
During Islamic rule of the Indian sub-continent
The Muslim conquest of the Indian subcontinent led to widespread carnage because Muslims regarded the Hindus as infidels and therefore slaughtered and converted millions of Hindus. Will Durant argued in his 1935 book "The Story of Civilization: Our Oriental Heritage" (page 459):
“The Mohammedan conquest of India is probably the bloodiest story in history. The Islamic historians and scholars have recorded with great glee and pride the slaughters of Hindus, forced conversions, abduction of Hindu women and children to slave markets and the destruction of temples carried out by the warriors of Islam during 800 AD to 1700 AD. Millions of Hindus were converted to Islam by sword during this period."
Persecution of Hindus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia