Hellboy, I know that arguing with you is about as smart as arguing with a a swine-flu-ridden swine, but you're on the Iowa Caucus thread claiming all kind of really stupid shit about RP when he just won the most delegates in Iowa, so it's time to put you in your sad little place.
You look at him and see a senile kook that is too liberal when indeed he is the strongest (physically), smartest, AND most conservative candidate you're offered. Read up and you'll know that all three of those claims are undeniable.
The mainstream media doesn't want people to know this though, because he'd be very bad for their profits. Very bad indeed... So of course they frame him as a kook at every chance they get. You fell for it instead of seeing the truth.
People like you care about first appearances like looks and non-issues like "whether or not Iran can make its' own nuke" when those are not important issues at all. You think it is, but they simply are not. You've been sold a story by the MSM.
Paul's foreign policy is the only sane one I've ever heard. Check it out; this film is pure awesome and explains what you obviously don't understand:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo]You Like Ron Paul, Except on Foreign Policy - YouTube[/ame]
If you're not FUCKING impressed with Paul's Prophetic record, watch this short vid... It should blow your mind, if you'd just pay attention:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM]Ron Paul - Predictions in Due Time - YouTube[/ame]
Yep, Paul made allllllllllllllllllllll those predictions back in April 2002, and 100% of them came true in some way. Heck, that's just the latest round-up though... Paul's been doing that for decades. He knows the score.
His MIND is what we want in the whitehouse. He's got a truly wise mind that comes around once in ten generations, and fucktards like you can't even see that it's any good at all. Moron.
Think Romney can do all of that accurate predictions? No? Why would we want him leading us then if someone else can?
I guess my main point here is that Paul is DAMN SMART. Not just about history, but about strategy too. Case in point: He didn't just go to Iowa to get the popular vote. He went there to grab the most delegates, and he succeeded.
In debates Paul is untouchable excepting only when the Media cheats. (Which can explain the times in the debate you thought he was wrong) If you ever put Paul up against another candidate, Paul makes them look like uninformed school children. Just like he's already done to Romney.
Romney may be a decent politician... But Paul's a motherfucking Prophet.
When we state that the left/right paradigm is meaningless is when we apply it to Politics in this country specifically.
What's important is who is on the dole & who's not. The fact that Obama is on the dole makes that liberal douchebag act just like Bush.
The Red and Blue parties, and everything they do that fills up the newspapers is called "Bread and Circuses." They aren't important, they aren't real, and they simply can be influenced in the MSM, or rigged outright if the powers that be need the outcomes to go differently.
We probably just witnessed a rigging last night... We'll never know though, I'm sure. But Paul has been voting for 30 whole years now in direct opposition to these hidden powers that be and It is obvious that this is the fundamental reason he's so popular today. Anyone who learns about his history and is smart enough to know that Red & Blue are a facade... Is an instant Paul supporter.
It's an awesome argument and a true one if you understand Paul. Which you obviously don't.
You look at him and see a senile kook that is too liberal when indeed he is the strongest (physically), smartest, AND most conservative candidate you're offered. Read up and you'll know that all three of those claims are undeniable.
The mainstream media doesn't want people to know this though, because he'd be very bad for their profits. Very bad indeed... So of course they frame him as a kook at every chance they get. You fell for it instead of seeing the truth.
People like you care about first appearances like looks and non-issues like "whether or not Iran can make its' own nuke" when those are not important issues at all. You think it is, but they simply are not. You've been sold a story by the MSM.
Paul's foreign policy is the only sane one I've ever heard. Check it out; this film is pure awesome and explains what you obviously don't understand:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I8NhRPo0WAo]You Like Ron Paul, Except on Foreign Policy - YouTube[/ame]
The ONLY people who ever claimed RP was a loon simply don't know his history and track record. It's uncanny. It's like he was sent from the future to tell us what happened to america and no one is listening to him. Not when he predicted 9/11, not when he predicted 50 other freaking things that have happened to us years later too, not on the economy, not even on Obamacare, which he was a huge voice against; and the only Doctor around to ask questions of in congress! Did the MSM give that any credit? Nope. All we saw was fucking Boehner walking down hallways looking angry. Fuck this stupid media.
If you're not FUCKING impressed with Paul's Prophetic record, watch this short vid... It should blow your mind, if you'd just pay attention:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM]Ron Paul - Predictions in Due Time - YouTube[/ame]
Yep, Paul made allllllllllllllllllllll those predictions back in April 2002, and 100% of them came true in some way. Heck, that's just the latest round-up though... Paul's been doing that for decades. He knows the score.
His MIND is what we want in the whitehouse. He's got a truly wise mind that comes around once in ten generations, and fucktards like you can't even see that it's any good at all. Moron.
Think Romney can do all of that accurate predictions? No? Why would we want him leading us then if someone else can?
I guess my main point here is that Paul is DAMN SMART. Not just about history, but about strategy too. Case in point: He didn't just go to Iowa to get the popular vote. He went there to grab the most delegates, and he succeeded.
In debates Paul is untouchable excepting only when the Media cheats. (Which can explain the times in the debate you thought he was wrong) If you ever put Paul up against another candidate, Paul makes them look like uninformed school children. Just like he's already done to Romney.
Romney may be a decent politician... But Paul's a motherfucking Prophet.
No one is arguing that the left and right want the exact same thing. We all know that Righties want no abortions while lefties want more welfare. We get that, and yes, there is some fundamental difference, which is what makes this so confusing to fools like you.
When we state that the left/right paradigm is meaningless is when we apply it to Politics in this country specifically.
What's important is who is on the dole & who's not. The fact that Obama is on the dole makes that liberal douchebag act just like Bush.
The Red and Blue parties, and everything they do that fills up the newspapers is called "Bread and Circuses." They aren't important, they aren't real, and they simply can be influenced in the MSM, or rigged outright if the powers that be need the outcomes to go differently.
We probably just witnessed a rigging last night... We'll never know though, I'm sure. But Paul has been voting for 30 whole years now in direct opposition to these hidden powers that be and It is obvious that this is the fundamental reason he's so popular today. Anyone who learns about his history and is smart enough to know that Red & Blue are a facade... Is an instant Paul supporter.
