A diet thread for grown-ups

Again, pictures of the posters should be mandatory. Just like on bb...

If you don't look at good as you pretend to sound: tais toi

[and skinny fat doesn't count... just in case you feed your kids whatever they want]
 


okay someone mentioned the O word - there is absolutely no proven benefit to organic food. Period. It will not help your diet. It just gives you that nice little image of down home style farming which is BS, and organic food uses pesticides too.
 
There seems to be a lot of not quoting your sources in this thread, or quoting pretty unreliable sources :(

okay someone mentioned the O word - there is absolutely no proven benefit to organic food. Period. It will not help your diet. It just gives you that nice little image of down home style farming which is BS, and organic food uses pesticides too.
Interesting - just had a look, and yeah, could only find 1 study to contradict (one by the USDA that said non-organic chicken had higher arsenic levels, but that's a 404 now).
 
Almost all evidence when it comes to diet is anecdotal.


So are you saying there is no difference between organic and inorganic biologically, or that organic food is worse than inorganic food?

Just that there's no difference, not better or worse. There are a lot of detriments to organic food, but not diet related.
 
The China study (affiliate link bros?) shows statistical evidence linking animal products (meat and dairy) to cancer, MS and a variety of other diseases. Read it, went vegan... not saying it's for everyone but it opened my eyes.

If less than 50% of your diet is raw, your digestive system recognizes food as a foreign body and triggers an immune response (slightly biased source). By increasing your raw food intake to 51% or greater your body's immune system is not activated.

Seeing as how diseases like MS, crohns, etc are auto immune disorders, increasing the amount of raw foods eaten could lessen some symptoms as well.


Ok, an interesting critique of the China study here:

The Cornell China Project--Examining the Vegan Claims proj

tldr; is that people have overblown the findings. Because it was an ecological study, you can only use it to generate hypotheses, not validate them. The study authors acknowledged this, but others have ignored it.


The really interesting statement there is:

"Collaborative analysis of 5 large studies finds no difference in death rates from cancer, vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian." (although there was certainly a difference with heart disease).

That one surprises me.
 
You have your vegans like Dr. Ornish and Dr. Esselstyn who make the argument that the only way to prevent and even reverse heart disease is by eating food with extremely low fat and ZERO cholesterol.

Then you have the Dr. Atkins and Dr. Bernstein types who say the exact opposite! The Atkins diet is far from a fad that has faded out. And much recent research shows that a low-carb, high protein and fat diet is very healthy. These guys say the more fat the better.

From what I've gathered these 4 guys are not bought out by any industry. But they do have books. They all also make great arguments and show many studies for their beliefs.

What are your goals? The Atkins Diet was designed to help you lose weight, not to help you live longer.

Here's how I understand it from growing up in a household with a lot of emphasis on healthy eating (and a lot of knowledge on the subject).

Have:
Fruits
Vegetables with Colors (Potatoes don't count)
White Meat (Mainly Chicken)
Fish (Especially Salmon)
Low Fat Milk
Nuts

Don't Have:
Processed Meats (lots of saturated fat, cholesterol, and carcinogens)
Red Meats (see above)
Processed Foods
Obvious Junk Food (Soda, Candy, Other Crap With Lots of Saturated Fats or Trans Fats)
Crappy Empty Carbs (Potatoes, White Bread, Pasta)

It really depends on what you're going after. I don't care about how strength conditioning or anything like that, I just care about maximizing my life expectancy. So if that is not your top priority then I'm sure some of foods you want to be eating change.

So are you saying there is no difference between organic and inorganic biologically, or that organic food is worse than inorganic food?
Just that there's no difference, not better or worse. There are a lot of detriments to organic food, but not diet related.
I think that's a difficult question to answer. If given the choice between organic and not organic I think you'd be foolish not to eat organic foods. There are lots of chemicals that we only fully understand decades after they've been introduced into food and if I have both options I'd rather not take my chances. With that being said, organic doesn't mean healthy. It should be pretty obvious that organic whole milk is worse for you than not organic skim milk, and organic beef is worse for you than not organic chicken.

Organic is probably better than not organic, but organic doesn't mean healthy. A cigarette can be all natural and organic too but that doesn't mean it's good for you.
 
I'll make this quick because I'm busy and I gotta FUCKING GO.

but I'm about to lay down some knowledge right here:

diet and exercise.
diet and exercise.

I lost 50 lbs since September and it was all from diet and fucking exercise man. I run 2 days a week, lift weights 4 days a week. (I see a personal trainer 2 of those lifting days to make sure my routine stays switched up/form is correct)

What I eat:

chicken, nuts, all types of fucking vegetables, brown rice, fish, lean cuts of steak and sometimes shoes.

I also cut out boozing 4 nights a week and cut that back to once a month.

I only shop at whole foods / organic marts to feed my narcissistic and snotty personality, so if ur fat and your starting to goto whole foods, get used to ppl staring at your ass for a while until you get skinny.
 
It should be pretty obvious that organic whole milk is worse for you than not organic skim milk, and organic beef is worse for you than not organic chicken.

Why would this be obvious? What are you basing this on? And do you know anything about omega-6 vs. omega-3 fats and the very high ratio of the former to the latter (i.e. pro-inflammatory) in conventionally grown animals?
 
Hey bro's I have this free trial weight loss offer for you. It's awesome, you'll lose 20 pounds in 5 days and its a FREE TRIAL just pay shipping and handling.

*Your bank account may be charged periodically for excessive amounts*



In all seriousness fuck dieting, running is best.
 
16404631.jpg
 
I eat a lot of bread, pasta and potatoes. I often have fried eggs and bacon for breakfast, I had 2 sandwiches for lunch, and at least 1 full fat latte every day. I ate a whole bag of doritos after my dinner tonight. I don't exercise apart from walking and I've actually lost 1kg since I last checked, I'm 62kg and 5'11. The only things I actively avoid are sugar, deep fried foods and soft drinks.

You might be thinking 'your cholesterol must be high', got it checked last week and it's:

LDL 2.2 nmol\L (the 'bad' one, reference range is <3.4)
HDL 2.3 nmol\L (the 'good' one, ref range is 0.9-2.2)

Giving me a total chol\HDL ratio of 2.1 which is fucken excellent. Somehow my good cholesterol is higher than my bad cholesterol.

The downside to my skinny genes is it's bloody hard to put on any muscle, I went to the gym for a year and only gained 2kg even though I was squatting and benching way above my body weight. My left knee sounds like velcro now too which is great.

My best mate put on 10kg of lean muscle in 8 months using ONE dumbell. Guy doesn't even have a bench, he lies on the floor and presses with one arm at a time. He doesn't take protein, doesn't eat 6 meals a day, doesn't do squats, doesn't do any of the typical gym bullshit you read everywhere. He lifts 2 hours a day, 6 days a week (overtraining is most likely complete bullshit too).

Genetics clearly have a massive influence, and just telling a fat guy to eat less is probably not going to make a lick of difference.
 
Ok, an interesting critique of the China study here:

The Cornell China Project--Examining the Vegan Claims proj

tldr; is that people have overblown the findings. Because it was an ecological study, you can only use it to generate hypotheses, not validate them. The study authors acknowledged this, but others have ignored it.


The really interesting statement there is:

"Collaborative analysis of 5 large studies finds no difference in death rates from cancer, vegetarian vs. non-vegetarian." (although there was certainly a difference with heart disease).

That one surprises me.

Don't feel like digging more stuff up for you right now as far as the last statement goes or to counter it but try and keep in mind the source of information from both sides. That guy is pretty anti-veg since he completely failed at raw/veganism. Some info about the guy who probably wrote that article: Tom Billings: dietary failure
 
What are your goals? The Atkins Diet was designed to help you lose weight, not to help you live longer.

Here's how I understand it from growing up in a household with a lot of emphasis on healthy eating (and a lot of knowledge on the subject).

Have:

Fish (Especially Salmon)

It's not that simple. A lot of farmed salmon is unacceptably high in Organochlorines (e.g. PCBs).

Global Assessment of Organic Contaminants in Farmed Salmon (I have the full journal article if anyone is interested)



It should be pretty obvious that organic whole milk is worse for you than not organic skim milk, and organic beef is worse for you than not organic chicken.

Again, not necessarily. That's according to the lipid hypothesis, which is disputable.

Elsevier

The fat content of milk is very dependant on the animal's diet. Grass-fed beef produces different (and some say healthier) milk than corn-fed. Also, the demonisation of saturated fats is based on a huge oversimplification. There are a many different saturated fatty acids, which all affect the body differently.

It's interesting how many people in this thread equate diet with weight loss. Not sure if that's because you've all been slinging the berriez for too long, or something that's embedded in the western psyche. What you is about far more than your waist measurement.
 
What are your goals? The Atkins Diet was designed to help you lose weight, not to help you live longer.

That's not true at all anymore. I'm unsure about Atkins original intention but low-carbing your whole life for health is becoming more and more mainstream.
 
What do you guys classify as healthy proteins? Is meat completely to abandon?

I've always contemplated going vegetarian because both heart disease and cancer are on my dad's side of the family (and they're all big time meat eaters)... but at the same time I also don't want to look like a wimp and want to keep some muscle and strength.

Do you think taking a protein/berry smoothie every day healthier/better than eating a lean piece of organic chicken/fish?
 
What do you guys classify as healthy proteins? Is meat completely to abandon?

I've always contemplated going vegetarian because both heart disease and cancer are on my dad's side of the family (and they're all big time meat eaters)... but at the same time I also don't want to look like a wimp and want to keep some muscle and strength.

Do you think taking a protein/berry smoothie every day healthier/better than eating a lean piece of organic chicken/fish?
Here's the thing about nutrition - it's always changing. A new study comes out that says "insert food here" is good and not a year later another study comes out to say the food is actually harmful. When it all comes down to it, eat a variety of meats, seafood, and other protein sources and you'll be fine.

FYI, Meat doesn't cause heart disease. A lack of physical activity and poor diet (lots of processed foods) generally are the two culprits.