Assange Is Fucked

Ar Scion said:
He could conceivably be charged for whatever laws we have relevant to espionage or something. I'm not a lawyer, but you don't have to be one to know we have laws against people who peddle government secrets.
Click to expand...

Yeah it's obvious you're not a lawyer. Wikileaks is protected by the first amendment of the constitution.

Go focus on building your backlinks or something.

identity_00[U said:
[/U];1081550]He is done and will get caught. Our society is setup to track people and unless you're living in cave and getting food delivered secretly its just no possible you will eventually trip and/or activate something that is traciable. No expenses or resources will spared to catch this guy. His only hope is that a non extradition country will spare him after arrest (assuming they are not to mad). My money is on the long arm of the usa law. They are very pursuasive and its machine is already working with interpol and the international warrants attached to him. They will have him soon enough.

Hopefully he has a backup plan with #2's in charge after they put him away.
Click to expand...

He hasn't been charged or indicted with ANYTHING yet by the US! The arrest warrant is over a Swedish rape case, which has a lot of allegations and very little evidence!

Did you even read the article, or did you just decide to mindlessly babble about it and then mash the "post reply" button?
 


The Swedish rape case is pretty dubious since one of the women accusing him of rape is an activist that advocates abusing the legal system for revenge.
 
Assange is Kevin Nitpick of the 2000s.

Also, the CIA is going to hire a big black guy (we're assuming he has a huge dong too) to ass fuck Assange until he dies from internal bleeding. Then they'll just report the news, and claim it's "death between two homo lovers"
 
Hacking the gov, wire fraud, espionage, racketeering, secrecy laws, the usa can call it whatever they want but rest assured this guy is done. One of the 188 countries will pick him up. The heat is on now. Regarding the rape actions that is just another reason why they will get him. No evidence? You really dont need any to charge someone (put them in jail with no or extremely high bail) and eventually let the jury decide. Testimony can be considered evidence. True or false alligation he'll be in custody shortly.....and the usa will press criminal charges.
 
identity_00 said:
Hacking the gov, wire fraud, espionage, racketeering, secrecy laws, the usa can call it whatever they want but rest assured this guy is done. One of the 188 countries will pick him up. The heat is on now. Regarding the rape actions that is just another reason why they will get him. No evidence? You really dont need any to charge someone (put them in jail with no or extremely high bail) and eventually let the jury decide. Testimony can be considered evidence. True or false alligation he'll be in custody shortly.....and the usa will press criminal charges.
Click to expand...

You're completely ignorant with how the legal system works, yet you continue to babble on as if you know something.

False testimony might work if the defendant in question has a public defender, who is over worked and just wants his client to accept a plea bargain from the prosecutor. But Assange already has an excellent lawyer in London. Hypothetically if the U.S were indict Assange with something, this would be a huge 1st amendment case, every major U.S. criminal defense attorney would want to represent him pro bono for the publicity it will bring them and their firm.

As far as the Swedish rape case goes, the arrest warrant is currently being appealed by Assange's lawyer.

Stop posting, you're embarrassing yourself.
 
How can anybody really think this guy is bad?

he is a hero - if somebody was telling me that i was being ripped off in any way shape or form, I would be more then grateful.


I think the media are going to persuade the public to hate this guy, and accuse him of all sorts of things (e.g. rape) and really tarnish his reputation before he tries to release anything else.

what ever happened to freedom of speech..
 
After reading this thread, my head now hurts. Can you somebody with some sense give us politically retarded folks a brief synopsis? What do you think this all means for the future?

Man, fuck life in the US. Constantly being manipulated and bombarded with this shit
 
30.11.10-Steve-Bell-on-th-005.jpg
 
He'd be wise to stay in the UK. If the US tries to extradite him, it would spark a massive political row as the leaks (amongst many other things) exposed how the UK is viewed by the US and the extradition relationship was already a political hot-potato.

In fact I'd go as far as to say it could split the government.
 
Assange fucking irritates me. Transparency? suuure, because 'collateral murder' does angle the debate.
If the wanker put as much effort into getting leaks from actual human rights abusers (Iran, China, Saudi Arabia etc), as he does pushing his radical commie agenda he might actually make some difference.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hellblazer
Cosy Hurl said:
Dude quoting Yahoo! News... incorrectly... about the wrong issue.

How many fucking cliches do you people want me to fucking bore you with?
Click to expand...

Let me break this down for you....

1) I didn't quote anything
2) If you want to think there is zero correlation between the rape allegations and the leaks, that's up to you.
3) If you think my anchor text is a quote, you're a fucking dumbass. The forum software pulls the title tag from the page of links that are posted.

In conclusion, shut the fuck up.
 
For those of you reading Assange's old blog- this is a pretty good article on the political theory behind why he began it.

Julian Assange’s actual goals for Wikileaks, lies less in exposing already-known misdeeds than in impeding the ability of conspiratorial state and military actors to communicate reliably amongst themselves: …while an organization structured by direct and open lines of communication will be much more vulnerable to outside penetration, the more opaque it becomes to itself (as a defense against the outside gaze), the less able it will be to “think” as a system, to communicate with itself. The more conspiratorial it becomes, in a certain sense, the less effective it will be as a conspiracy.
Click to expand...

Julian Assange and the Computer Conspiracy;
 
Bluechinagroup, i guess we will find out shortly after he is snatched up and put in jail until they figure what to do with him. It wont be long before the long arm of the law gets this guy. I have mad respect his work, however.
 
bluechinagroup said:
Yeah it's obvious you're not a lawyer. Wikileaks is protected by the first amendment of the constitution.

Go focus on building your backlinks or something.
Click to expand...

The Obama administration, saying the document dump endangered lives, has launched a criminal investigation, suggesting Assange might be charged with violating U.S. secrecy laws or even espionage.
Click to expand...

-WaPo, 24 hours after my post.

Seriously brah.
 
gbmack said:
The article was a little hard to follow, but is it basically saying that Wikileaks was set up by the US government so that the public would support the total annihilation of North Korea?

Or what am i missing here?
Click to expand...
The ridiculous nature of the quote entirely. That's what your missing.
 
amanda11 said:
Assange is Kevin Nitpick of the 2000s.
Click to expand...

Not to nitpick, but it's actually spelled Mitnick. :D


Gary McKinnon might be the Mitnick of the 2000s :

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B4PkNPCEnJM&]YouTube - UFOs-NASA (http://freegary.org.uk/)[/ame]
 
What's happening in the world is no different from what's going on on this thread.

PEOPLE fighting with PEOPLE.

Maybe they'll grow up some day or in worst case, will end up destroying everything. We'll see.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom